NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
+24
Aqi
Mr. PD
Mad max
sV
Fahad
Ishaq
Fardin Kibria
Eishan
MI
Haseeh
Anurag
ND
Raminder
Parth
Rishabh
Nick
bchattopadhyay
Vighnesh
DKN
Viresh
Saad
Arjun
Bat Cool
Deep Dey
28 posters
Page 4 of 8
Page 4 of 8 • 
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 
NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Tue 17 Jul 2012, 11:18 pm
First topic message reminder :
JUST AS WE SEE ICC GIVES IMPORTANCE TO RECENT PERFORMANCE IN RANKINGS, SINCE CW HAS PASSED 1.5 YEAR, I HAVE THOUGHT OF SAME IDEA.
I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).
I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.
2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.
4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.
5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).
JUST AS WE SEE ICC GIVES IMPORTANCE TO RECENT PERFORMANCE IN RANKINGS, SINCE CW HAS PASSED 1.5 YEAR, I HAVE THOUGHT OF SAME IDEA.
I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).
I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.
2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.
4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.
5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).
Last edited by Throw Me Out on Thu 25 Oct 2012, 6:57 pm; edited 1 time in total
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
ND- Level 24
-
Posts : 18544
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Parth Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:35 pm
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Parth- Level 26
-
Posts : 23020
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by ND Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:35 pm
Parth wrote:YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
hr ka bhi paisa gaya :bitch:
ND- Level 24
-
Posts : 18544
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:36 pm
DKN wrote:so u want 99 times collectively from Cosmos :longhat: :Mecool: :hahaha:Throw Me Out wrote:bchattopadhyay wrote:Throw Me Out wrote:i don't mind any team saying NO.
But write that NO 99 times.
it hardly takes 9-10 minutes to write 99 No's
u fuckin kiddin me...hw dare u ask such a thing to be done in the first place...am not ur servant tht i will write 99 times no...
when did i take your name?????????????????
did i ever mentioned your name???
cosmos is written clearly, no ones name is written in main post
koi bhi likhe mujhe kya??????????
i want every other team to get a fair deal in rankings, else lower ranked teams will always stay at low only.
Ideally speaking, dynamos have no business to sit at 5th spot in od rankings, they should be higher
even if warriors say no, I will write it 99 times
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:37 pm
Neeraj wrote:Neeraj wrote:Yes :bitch:
deep valid nA?
vignesh and mi se discuss kiya na????
later agar, contradiction hua na, is baar 10000 nahi ,50000 fm jayenge
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Raminder Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:37 pm
bchattopadhyay wrote:n u expect deep tht we will let u get away with such cheap methods...
Deep Sorry
Dude ..Domz also accepted this earlier..and that's why they lost their top spot...that time also you must have accepted this na...so why not now ?
Cuz you are at top ?
Raminder- Level 25
-
Posts : 21735
ND- Level 24
-
Posts : 18544
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:40 pm
Neeraj wrote:how many votes so faR ? :roll:
only from Bolts
Yes
Warriors later jawab denge, dominators ne dekha nahi hai abhi tak
cosmos yet to reply
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Anurag Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:41 pm
Height of eccentricity from Deep, all I can say.
Immaturity at its best.
Immaturity at its best.
Anurag- Level 31
-
Posts : 33149
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by ND Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:41 pm
Throw Me Out wrote:Neeraj wrote:Neeraj wrote:Yes :bitch:
deep valid nA?
vignesh and mi se discuss kiya na????
later agar, contradiction hua na, is baar 10000 nahi ,50000 fm jayenge
mother of india har baat pe paisa nahi katvayenge ham
:lol: :lol: dhamki na diya karo :bitch:
ND- Level 24
-
Posts : 18544
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:42 pm
Anurag wrote:Height of eccentricity from Deep, all I can say.
Immaturity at its best.
Jo samajhna hai samjho :fail: :fail: :fail:
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Raminder Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:43 pm
Anurag wrote:Height of eccentricity from Deep, all I can say.
Immaturity at its best.
Dude ...but he's right too !!
IN FTP-2 we lost 12 matches and won 1
..and because of that we are at last till now And in FTP-3...except for last 2 months
..i think we did fairly well !We don't deserve to be at last ...( that's what i think )!
Raminder- Level 25
-
Posts : 21735
Vighnesh- Level 35
-
Posts : 44018
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Haseeh Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:45 pm
Example
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Haseeh- Level 30
-
Posts : 32405
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Viresh Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:45 pm
Is it a punishment or wat? :bitch:2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
Viresh- Level 34
-
Posts : 41308
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Anurag Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:46 pm
Raminder wrote:Anurag wrote:Height of eccentricity from Deep, all I can say.
Immaturity at its best.
Dude ...but he's right too !!
IN FTP-2 we lost 12 matches and won 1
And in FTP-3...except for last 2 months
We don't deserve to be at last ...( that's what i think )!
I too want this new system.
But the NO- 99 times is immature and I am crticising that part only.
Anurag- Level 31
-
Posts : 33149
ND- Level 24
-
Posts : 18544
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Raminder Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:47 pm
Anurag wrote:Raminder wrote:Anurag wrote:Height of eccentricity from Deep, all I can say.
Immaturity at its best.
Dude ...but he's right too !!
IN FTP-2 we lost 12 matches and won 1
And in FTP-3...except for last 2 months
We don't deserve to be at last ...( that's what i think )!
I too want this new system.
But the NO- 99 times is immature and I am crticising that part only.
:mother: ..ok
:bitch:
Raminder- Level 25
-
Posts : 21735
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:48 pm
Viresh wrote:Is it a punishment or wat? :bitch:2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
the one who says no, because of that yes which will in majority(taking all teams into consideration) will loose na.
come on 99 is not a big number
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Viresh- Level 34
-
Posts : 41308
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by ND Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:49 pm
Anurag wrote:Raminder wrote:Anurag wrote:Height of eccentricity from Deep, all I can say.
Immaturity at its best.
Dude ...but he's right too !!
IN FTP-2 we lost 12 matches and won 1
And in FTP-3...except for last 2 months
We don't deserve to be at last ...( that's what i think )!
I too want this new system.
But the NO- 99 times is immature and I am crticising that part only.
:bitch: apne bhale ki socho na dusre apne aap dekh lenge :bitch:
manmohan bhi yehi kehta hai
ND- Level 24
-
Posts : 18544
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Vighnesh Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:50 pm
Smoking weed nwadays?Throw Me Out wrote:Viresh wrote:Is it a punishment or wat? :bitch:2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
the one who says no, because of that yes which will in majority(taking all teams into consideration) will loose na.
come on 99 is not a big number
:lol:
Vighnesh- Level 35
-
Posts : 44018
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Anurag Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:51 pm
Vignesh wrote:Smoking weed nwadays?Throw Me Out wrote:Viresh wrote:Is it a punishment or wat?2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
the one who says no, because of that yes which will in majority(taking all teams into consideration) will loose na.
come on 99 is not a big number
LOL
Anurag- Level 31
-
Posts : 33149
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:52 pm
Viresh wrote:no worries
Excel hai na 8)
as you wish
jaha likhna hai likho
bas 99 times hi chahiye, na ek jyada aur na ek kam
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Page 4 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Page 4 of 8
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|
