NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
+24
Aqi
Mr. PD
Mad max
sV
Fahad
Ishaq
Fardin Kibria
Eishan
MI
Haseeh
Anurag
ND
Raminder
Parth
Rishabh
Nick
bchattopadhyay
Vighnesh
DKN
Viresh
Saad
Arjun
Bat Cool
Deep Dey
28 posters
Page 5 of 8
Page 5 of 8 • 
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 
NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Tue 17 Jul 2012, 11:18 pm
First topic message reminder :
JUST AS WE SEE ICC GIVES IMPORTANCE TO RECENT PERFORMANCE IN RANKINGS, SINCE CW HAS PASSED 1.5 YEAR, I HAVE THOUGHT OF SAME IDEA.
I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).
I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.
2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.
4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.
5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).
JUST AS WE SEE ICC GIVES IMPORTANCE TO RECENT PERFORMANCE IN RANKINGS, SINCE CW HAS PASSED 1.5 YEAR, I HAVE THOUGHT OF SAME IDEA.
I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).
I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.
2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.
4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.
5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).
Last edited by Throw Me Out on Thu 25 Oct 2012, 6:57 pm; edited 1 time in total
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by ND Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:53 pm
respect deep 
vo na hota toh cw kab ka bandh ho chuka hota :bitch:
vo na hota toh cw kab ka bandh ho chuka hota :bitch:
ND- Level 24
-
Posts : 18544
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Vighnesh Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:54 pm
haan :clapping:Neeraj wrote:respect deep
vo na hota toh cw kab ka bandh ho chuka hota :bitch:
Vighnesh- Level 35
-
Posts : 44018
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by bchattopadhyay Thu 25 Oct 2012, 8:45 pm
Raminder wrote:bchattopadhyay wrote:n u expect deep tht we will let u get away with such cheap methods...
Deep Sorry
Dude ..Domz also accepted this earlier..and that's why they lost their top spot...that time also you must have accepted this na...so why not now ?
Cuz you are at top ?
no not at all...nothin was asked frm us at tht time...n durin tht time
we wr at rank 2 along with domz which was far better...if it was asked
to us thn i would hv still preferred the old method devised by
zak..get ur facts straight n thn pitch in questions not before tht...
bchattopadhyay- Level 23
-
Posts : 17537
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Raminder Thu 25 Oct 2012, 8:49 pm
bchattopadhyay wrote:Raminder wrote:bchattopadhyay wrote:n u expect deep tht we will let u get away with such cheap methods...
Deep Sorry
Dude ..Domz also accepted this earlier..and that's why they lost their top spot...that time also you must have accepted this na...so why not now ?
Cuz you are at top ?
no not at all...nothin was asked frm us at tht time...n durin tht time
we wr at rank 2 along with domz which was far better...if it was asked
to us thn i would hv still preferred the old method devised by
zak..get ur facts straight n thn pitch in questions not before tht...
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
What's this then ?
Raminder- Level 25
-
Posts : 21735
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by bchattopadhyay Thu 25 Oct 2012, 8:53 pm
IF EVERYONE WANTS TO GET THT RANK 1 THN BE BRAVE N START FRM FRESH...COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL EXISTING RANKS N DATA N START REFRESH....THN IT WILL BE MORE DESERVING...
bchattopadhyay- Level 23
-
Posts : 17537
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 8:55 pm
bchattopadhyay wrote:IF EVERYONE WANTS TO GET THT RANK 1 THN BE BRAVE N START FRM FRESH...COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL EXISTING RANKS N DATA N START REFRESH....THN IT WILL BE MORE DESERVING...
In international rankings, do you seeing rankings getting refreshed from begginging everyday
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by bchattopadhyay Thu 25 Oct 2012, 8:57 pm
Raminder wrote:bchattopadhyay wrote:Raminder wrote:bchattopadhyay wrote:n u expect deep tht we will let u get away with such cheap methods...
Deep Sorry
Dude ..Domz also accepted this earlier..and that's why they lost their top spot...that time also you must have accepted this na...so why not now ?
Cuz you are at top ?
no not at all...nothin was asked frm us at tht time...n durin tht time
we wr at rank 2 along with domz which was far better...if it was asked
to us thn i would hv still preferred the old method devised by
zak..get ur facts straight n thn pitch in questions not before tht...
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
What's this then ?
i was owner back thn n i did say tht i was not happy with tht...but nothin was done abt it...becox our rank was not the important factor...our rank in t20 was already 1 by thn n in odi it was 2...so i mentioned tht let the old one be kept...but others preferred the new one....
bchattopadhyay- Level 23
-
Posts : 17537
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by bchattopadhyay Thu 25 Oct 2012, 8:59 pm
Throw Me Out wrote:bchattopadhyay wrote:IF EVERYONE WANTS TO GET THT RANK 1 THN BE BRAVE N START FRM FRESH...COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL EXISTING RANKS N DATA N START REFRESH....THN IT WILL BE MORE DESERVING...
In international rankings, do you seeing rankings getting refreshed from begginging everyday
fix up ur mind u idiot...wat do u want...do u want to make ur own rules or u want to follow rules frm the book...it seems u ar making mockery of it....
3 MONTHS BACK U TEAM WAS NOTHIN N U KEPT QUITE...SINCE LAST 3 MONTHS U STRTED PERFORMIN REALLY WELL N UR TAIL GREW ENOUGH TO STRT PITCH THESE CHEAP IDEAS BECOZ U KNW THT UR TEAM WONT SUFFER FRM IT UNLIKE US WHO DIDNT PERFORM THT WELL IN LAST 2-3 MONTHS WHICH WAS QUITE THE REVERSE BEFORE THT....SO THINK BEFORE U LEAP DEEP....AM AN OLD MEMBER OF THIS SITE N ENOUGH INFO TO TACKLE PEOPLE LIKE U .....
bchattopadhyay- Level 23
-
Posts : 17537
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 9:03 pm
bchattopadhyay wrote:Throw Me Out wrote:bchattopadhyay wrote:IF EVERYONE WANTS TO GET THT RANK 1 THN BE BRAVE N START FRM FRESH...COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL EXISTING RANKS N DATA N START REFRESH....THN IT WILL BE MORE DESERVING...
In international rankings, do you seeing rankings getting refreshed from begginging everyday
fix up ur mind u idiot...wat do u want...do u want to make ur own rules or u want to follow rules frm the book...it seems u ar making mockery of it....
3 MONTHS BACK U TEAM WAS NOTHIN N U KEPT QUITE...SINCE LAST 3 MONTHS U STRTED PERFORMIN REALLY WELL N UR TAIL GREW ENOUGH TO STRT PITCH THESE CHEAP IDEAS BECOZ U KNW THT UR TEAM WONT SUFFER FRM IT UNLIKE US WHO DIDNT PERFORM THT WELL IN LAST 2-3 MONTHS WHICH WAS QUITE THE REVERSE BEFORE THT....SO THINK BEFORE U LEAP DEEP....AM AN OLD MEMBER OF THIS SITE N ENOUGH INFO TO TACKLE PEOPLE LIKE U .....
patience
will reply after the match
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by bchattopadhyay Thu 25 Oct 2012, 9:09 pm
i dont want a reply frm u ....do watever u want...do u even see me active in this forum anymore...
bchattopadhyay- Level 23
-
Posts : 17537
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by bchattopadhyay Thu 25 Oct 2012, 9:11 pm
its a ridicule tht i wasted my time in spendin tht much ideas into this site...saale chillar party wala halat ho gaya site ka...all magic gone ...kaha iska standard tha aur kaha iska standard chala gaya abhi....
bchattopadhyay- Level 23
-
Posts : 17537
MI- Level 31
-
Posts : 33555
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Eishan Thu 25 Oct 2012, 9:20 pm
Lolz why u all fighting guys question was simple say "No or Yes" ofcourse 99 times thing is really unnecessary .. also it was written no need to reply reason and others should not tease ppl saying No.. so why all this Fight i will simply start banning members who will now Fight on this thing..
Eishan- Level 22
-
Posts : 15640
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 9:21 pm
Eishan(Mr. wall) wrote:Lolz why u all fighting guys question was simple say "No or Yes" ofcourse 99 times thing is really unnecessary .. also it was written no need to reply reason and others should not tease ppl saying No.. so why all this Fight i will simply start banning members who will now Fight on this thing..
1st ban me then
i haven't changed my user name yet though
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Eishan Thu 25 Oct 2012, 9:21 pm
baptu bhai without ur games spark is indeed lost buts still let it be.. we are soo busy we cannt do anythingbchattopadhyay wrote:its a ridicule tht i wasted my time in spendin tht much ideas into this site...saale chillar party wala halat ho gaya site ka...all magic gone ...kaha iska standard tha aur kaha iska standard chala gaya abhi....
so whoever is doing anything atall its good 
Eishan- Level 22
-
Posts : 15640
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 9:22 pm
Eishan(Mr. wall) wrote:Lolz why u all fighting guys question was simple say "No or Yes" ofcourse 99 times thing is really unnecessary .. also it was written no need to reply reason and others should not tease ppl saying No.. so why all this Fight i will simply start banning members who will now Fight on this thing..
patience i am searching a thread made about 10-11 months ago, i hope to find it
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Eishan Thu 25 Oct 2012, 9:22 pm
abey tere 1st comment ka hi toh support kiya hai. u really lost ur mind kya?Throw Me Out wrote:Eishan(Mr. wall) wrote:Lolz why u all fighting guys question was simple say "No or Yes" ofcourse 99 times thing is really unnecessary .. also it was written no need to reply reason and others should not tease ppl saying No.. so why all this Fight i will simply start banning members who will now Fight on this thing..
1st ban me then
i haven't changed my user name yet though
Eishan- Level 22
-
Posts : 15640
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by bchattopadhyay Thu 25 Oct 2012, 9:23 pm
ban me yaar..nehi toh i will break his neck for good tonite...bloody moron....bahar se sharif face dikhata hai...undar se utna hi jalebi ke tara twisted hya...ban me for 6 months pls....
bchattopadhyay- Level 23
-
Posts : 17537
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Eishan Thu 25 Oct 2012, 9:24 pm
what will happen if u find watever thread u searching? what u exactly trying to do or prove? :mother:Throw Me Out wrote:Eishan(Mr. wall) wrote:Lolz why u all fighting guys question was simple say "No or Yes" ofcourse 99 times thing is really unnecessary .. also it was written no need to reply reason and others should not tease ppl saying No.. so why all this Fight i will simply start banning members who will now Fight on this thing..
patience i am searching a thread made about 10-11 months ago, i hope to find it
Eishan- Level 22
-
Posts : 15640
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 9:25 pm
Eishan(Mr. wall) wrote:abey tere 1st comment ka hi toh support kiya hai. u really lost ur mind kya?Throw Me Out wrote:Eishan(Mr. wall) wrote:Lolz why u all fighting guys question was simple say "No or Yes" ofcourse 99 times thing is really unnecessary .. also it was written no need to reply reason and others should not tease ppl saying No.. so why all this Fight i will simply start banning members who will now Fight on this thing..
1st ban me then
i haven't changed my user name yet though
i have said in previous page that yes will have a majority for sure, if anyone says NO, then Yes will pay the price for it.
So 99 is not a big number
Again i say, dynamos has no business to sit at 5th spot in od
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Eishan Thu 25 Oct 2012, 9:25 pm
6 months mai thik ho jayega sab?bchattopadhyay wrote:ban me yaar..nehi toh i will break his neck for good tonite...bloody moron....bahar se sharif face dikhata hai...undar se utna hi jalebi ke tara twisted hya...ban me for 6 months pls....
ya validity extend karwani hai? lolz forget what i said abt banning i m out of this n so should be u.. you replied for the question which was asked let them fight over it
Eishan- Level 22
-
Posts : 15640
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by bchattopadhyay Thu 25 Oct 2012, 9:27 pm
kya proof karega..simple tht i am wrong...cant u see he is good only in tht...he feels an orgasmic rush in his loins whn he proves other members are wrong....thts his nature...saala aacha kiya yea site chhor ke cricinc join kiya...at least i cn chat like normal people over thr...
bchattopadhyay- Level 23
-
Posts : 17537
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by bchattopadhyay Thu 25 Oct 2012, 9:27 pm
kya proof karega..simple tht i am wrong...cant u see he is good only in tht...he feels an orgasmic rush in his loins whn he proves other members are wrong....thts his nature...saala aacha kiya yea site chhor ke cricinc join kiya...at least i cn chat like normal people over thr...
bchattopadhyay- Level 23
-
Posts : 17537
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 10:26 pm
bchattopadhyay wrote:Raminder wrote:bchattopadhyay wrote:Raminder wrote:bchattopadhyay wrote:n u expect deep tht we will let u get away with such cheap methods...
Deep Sorry
Dude ..Domz also accepted this earlier..and that's why they lost their top spot...that time also you must have accepted this na...so why not now ?
Cuz you are at top ?
no not at all...nothin was asked frm us at tht time...n durin tht time
we wr at rank 2 along with domz which was far better...if it was asked
to us thn i would hv still preferred the old method devised by
zak..get ur facts straight n thn pitch in questions not before tht...
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
What's this then ?
i was owner back thn n i did say tht i was not happy with tht...but nothin was done abt it...becox our rank was not the important factor...our rank in t20 was already 1 by thn n in odi it was 2...so i mentioned tht let the old one be kept...but others preferred the new one....
http://www.cwforums.net/t2258-say-yes-or-no-from-heart-1st-then-ask-queryno-justification-required
Isn't that the thread???????????
you can confirm from viresh,eishan or sv, whether any posts are deleted from it or not
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Page 5 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Page 5 of 8
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|
