NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
+24
Aqi
Mr. PD
Mad max
sV
Fahad
Ishaq
Fardin Kibria
Eishan
MI
Haseeh
Anurag
ND
Raminder
Parth
Rishabh
Nick
bchattopadhyay
Vighnesh
DKN
Viresh
Saad
Arjun
Bat Cool
Deep Dey
28 posters
Page 6 of 8
Page 6 of 8 • 
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 
NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Tue 17 Jul 2012, 11:18 pm
First topic message reminder :
JUST AS WE SEE ICC GIVES IMPORTANCE TO RECENT PERFORMANCE IN RANKINGS, SINCE CW HAS PASSED 1.5 YEAR, I HAVE THOUGHT OF SAME IDEA.
I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).
I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.
2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.
4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.
5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).
JUST AS WE SEE ICC GIVES IMPORTANCE TO RECENT PERFORMANCE IN RANKINGS, SINCE CW HAS PASSED 1.5 YEAR, I HAVE THOUGHT OF SAME IDEA.
I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).
I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.
2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.
4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.
5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).
Last edited by Throw Me Out on Thu 25 Oct 2012, 6:57 pm; edited 1 time in total
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 10:30 pm
bchattopadhyay wrote:Throw Me Out wrote:bchattopadhyay wrote:IF EVERYONE WANTS TO GET THT RANK 1 THN BE BRAVE N START FRM FRESH...COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL EXISTING RANKS N DATA N START REFRESH....THN IT WILL BE MORE DESERVING...
In international rankings, do you seeing rankings getting refreshed from begginging everyday
fix up ur mind u idiot...wat do u want...do u want to make ur own rules or u want to follow rules frm the book...it seems u ar making mockery of it....
3 MONTHS BACK U TEAM WAS NOTHIN N U KEPT QUITE...SINCE LAST 3 MONTHS U STRTED PERFORMIN REALLY WELL N UR TAIL GREW ENOUGH TO STRT PITCH THESE CHEAP IDEAS BECOZ U KNW THT UR TEAM WONT SUFFER FRM IT UNLIKE US WHO DIDNT PERFORM THT WELL IN LAST 2-3 MONTHS WHICH WAS QUITE THE REVERSE BEFORE THT....SO THINK BEFORE U LEAP DEEP....AM AN OLD MEMBER OF THIS SITE N ENOUGH INFO TO TACKLE PEOPLE LIKE U .....
did i ever hide the fact that the method i used is same as icc uses.
come on i am not any david kendrix
and you said 3 months ago, warriors was nothing, correct when did i say we were superior
kindly check the date of this thread made.
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Parth- Level 26
-
Posts : 23020
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 10:42 pm
i mentioned few simple things, simple simple things,simple simple simple things, simple simple simple.................... things:
either say yes or either say NO (99 times) or better don't reply (which was though not mentioned)
still it became such a big issues.
i didn't force anyone to accept it nor forced anyone to reject it.
last time raminder asked for it, so i made this thread on 17th july, few days ago debroop asked for it indirectly ,so modified that old thread this time.
i just wanted to know that has anything changed from 17th july to 25th october not, nothing changed.
so as for the concept of writing no's 99 times is concerned, 3rd time i am saying it, every team will want it to refreshed,if any one says NO then majority will loose
so if the team who says NO is kind enough, they will change to YES in the process of writing 99 times NO.
If they are not kind of enough, well there is nothing wrong in being unkind
either say yes or either say NO (99 times) or better don't reply (which was though not mentioned)
still it became such a big issues.
i didn't force anyone to accept it nor forced anyone to reject it.
last time raminder asked for it, so i made this thread on 17th july, few days ago debroop asked for it indirectly ,so modified that old thread this time.
i just wanted to know that has anything changed from 17th july to 25th october not, nothing changed.
so as for the concept of writing no's 99 times is concerned, 3rd time i am saying it, every team will want it to refreshed,if any one says NO then majority will loose
so if the team who says NO is kind enough, they will change to YES in the process of writing 99 times NO.
If they are not kind of enough, well there is nothing wrong in being unkind
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Fardin Kibria Thu 25 Oct 2012, 10:43 pm
If Baptu cares so much about his no.1 spot then leave it like this.... No need of greediness to spread
Fardin Kibria- Level 31
-
Posts : 33703
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 10:44 pm
Fardin wrote:If Baptu cares so much about his no.1 spot then leave it like this.... No need of greediness to spread
read the main post again
Don't angry me
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Fardin Kibria Thu 25 Oct 2012, 10:46 pm
I did man hence I made that post
Fardin Kibria- Level 31
-
Posts : 33703
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Rishabh Thu 25 Oct 2012, 10:52 pm
arri baap re.. yahan kaisi khichdi pak gyi
BTW I ignored dis thread long time back but aaj toh zaada hi ho gya.
I really dont care about our first position..
Infact I really dont care about rankings :bitch:
BTW I ignored dis thread long time back but aaj toh zaada hi ho gya.
I really dont care about our first position..
Infact I really dont care about rankings :bitch:
Rishabh- Level 36
-
Posts : 46791
Viresh- Level 34
-
Posts : 41308
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Parth Thu 25 Oct 2012, 10:55 pm
Rish 
I really dont care about our 6th Place :bitch:
I really dont care about our 6th Place :bitch:
Parth- Level 26
-
Posts : 23020
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Viresh Thu 25 Oct 2012, 10:56 pm
Cosmos :
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Viresh- Level 34
-
Posts : 41308
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Viresh Thu 25 Oct 2012, 10:58 pm
1 NO
2 NO
3 NO
4 NO
5 NO
6 NO
7 NO
8 NO
9 NO
10 NO
11 NO
12 NO
13 NO
14 NO
15 NO
16 NO
17 NO
18 NO
19 NO
20 NO
21 NO
22 NO
23 NO
24 NO
25 NO
26 NO
27 NO
28 NO
29 NO
30 NO
31 NO
32 NO
33 NO
34 NO
35 NO
36 NO
37 NO
38 NO
39 NO
40 NO
41 NO
42 NO
43 NO
44 NO
45 NO
46 NO
47 NO
48 NO
49 NO
50 NO
51 NO
52 NO
53 NO
54 NO
55 NO
56 NO
57 NO
58 NO
59 NO
60 NO
61 NO
62 NO
63 NO
64 NO
65 NO
66 NO
67 NO
68 NO
69 NO
70 NO
71 NO
72 NO
73 NO
74 NO
75 NO
76 NO
77 NO
78 NO
79 NO
80 NO
81 NO
82 NO
83 NO
84 NO
85 NO
86 NO
87 NO
88 NO
89 NO
90 NO
91 NO
92 NO
93 NO
94 NO
95 NO
96 NO
97 NO
98 NO
99 NO
CREDITS : EXCEL :bitch:
2 NO
3 NO
4 NO
5 NO
6 NO
7 NO
8 NO
9 NO
10 NO
11 NO
12 NO
13 NO
14 NO
15 NO
16 NO
17 NO
18 NO
19 NO
20 NO
21 NO
22 NO
23 NO
24 NO
25 NO
26 NO
27 NO
28 NO
29 NO
30 NO
31 NO
32 NO
33 NO
34 NO
35 NO
36 NO
37 NO
38 NO
39 NO
40 NO
41 NO
42 NO
43 NO
44 NO
45 NO
46 NO
47 NO
48 NO
49 NO
50 NO
51 NO
52 NO
53 NO
54 NO
55 NO
56 NO
57 NO
58 NO
59 NO
60 NO
61 NO
62 NO
63 NO
64 NO
65 NO
66 NO
67 NO
68 NO
69 NO
70 NO
71 NO
72 NO
73 NO
74 NO
75 NO
76 NO
77 NO
78 NO
79 NO
80 NO
81 NO
82 NO
83 NO
84 NO
85 NO
86 NO
87 NO
88 NO
89 NO
90 NO
91 NO
92 NO
93 NO
94 NO
95 NO
96 NO
97 NO
98 NO
99 NO
CREDITS : EXCEL :bitch:
Viresh- Level 34
-
Posts : 41308
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Rishabh Thu 25 Oct 2012, 11:00 pm
Dynamos :
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Rishabh- Level 36
-
Posts : 46791
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 11:01 pm
Rish wrote:Dynamos :
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
inconsequential
+
dynamos also has one more member named something debroop roy if i am not wrong
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Rishabh Thu 25 Oct 2012, 11:01 pm
I
NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD),
WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD
DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)
Matlab menne faltu mein 99 baar no lekha :FU:
Rishabh- Level 36
-
Posts : 46791
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Parth Thu 25 Oct 2012, 11:02 pm
Rish tune sirf 10 baar likha phir 9 times copy-paste kiye aur ek baar erase kiya 
Parth- Level 26
-
Posts : 23020
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Rishabh Thu 25 Oct 2012, 11:02 pm
Throw Me Out wrote:Rish wrote:Dynamos :
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
inconsequential
+
dynamos also has one more member named something debroop roy if i am not wrong
Mein hun owner
Still usse pucch lena
Rishabh- Level 36
-
Posts : 46791
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 11:05 pm
Rish wrote:Throw Me Out wrote:Rish wrote:Dynamos :
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
inconsequential
+
dynamos also has one more member named something debroop roy if i am not wrong
Mein hun owner
Still usse pucch lena
he mentioned it indirectly
pehle ke posts padhte nahi ho kya????????????
warna mujhe koi shauk chadha hai fir se 1 week ke liye ranking ke peeche sir patku,
100's of calculation ,1000's of editing ............... :try: :try:
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Viresh Thu 25 Oct 2012, 11:06 pm
He just copied my postParth wrote:Rish tune sirf 10 baar likha phir 9 times copy-paste kiye aur ek baar erase kiya
He is genius :bitch:
Viresh- Level 34
-
Posts : 41308
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Parth Thu 25 Oct 2012, 11:08 pm
Viresh wrote:He just copied my postParth wrote:Rish tune sirf 10 baar likha phir 9 times copy-paste kiye aur ek baar erase kiya
He is genius
I thought Eienstien is genius
Parth- Level 26
-
Posts : 23020
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Viresh Thu 25 Oct 2012, 11:09 pm
First write Einstein's spelling properly :bitch:Parth wrote:Viresh wrote:He just copied my postParth wrote:Rish tune sirf 10 baar likha phir 9 times copy-paste kiye aur ek baar erase kiya
He is genius
I thought Eienstien is genius
Viresh- Level 34
-
Posts : 41308
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Ishaq Fri 26 Oct 2012, 9:48 am
Idea Seems to be good 
It will benefit all the teams (new and old )
It will benefit all the teams (new and old )
Ishaq- Level 23
-
Posts : 16237
Parth- Level 26
-
Posts : 23020
Parth- Level 26
-
Posts : 23020
Nick- Level 33
-
Posts : 38834
Page 6 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Page 6 of 8
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|
