NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS

bchattopadhyay wrote:so wat..u ar tryin to play sm sick joke like zak or wat...i dont care wat is written above...

Raminder wrote:

bchattopadhyay wrote:so wat..u ar tryin to play sm sick joke like zak or wat...i dont care wat is written above...

Darpok
Accept it

Throw Me Out wrote:

Raminder wrote:

bchattopadhyay wrote:so wat..u ar tryin to play sm sick joke like zak or wat...i dont care wat is written above...

Darpok
Accept it

@raminder
again i say, don't make me angry

bchattopadhyay wrote:so wat..u ar tryin to play sm sick joke like zak or wat...i dont care wat is written above...

Throw Me Out wrote:JUST AS WE SEE ICC GIVES IMPORTANCE TO RECENT PERFORMANCE IN RANKINGS, SINCE CW HAS PASSED 1.5 YEAR, I HAVE THOUGHT OF SAME IDEA.

I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).

I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)

THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.

NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.

2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.

FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.

3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.

4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.

5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).

Throw Me Out wrote:i don't mind any team saying NO.

But write that NO 99 times.

it hardly takes 9-10 minutes to write 99 No's

bchattopadhyay wrote:

Throw Me Out wrote:i don't mind any team saying NO.

But write that NO 99 times.

it hardly takes 9-10 minutes to write 99 No's

u fuckin kiddin me...hw dare u ask such a thing to be done in the first place...am not ur servant tht i will write 99 times no...

Raminder wrote:

DKN wrote:SH already refused too

Who said ?

We want this !
We won't be at last then atleast !

Anurag wrote:

Raminder wrote:

DKN wrote:SH already refused too

Who said ?

We want this !
We won't be at last then atleast !

We will be dead last

EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER

bchattopadhyay wrote:

Throw Me Out wrote:i don't mind any team saying NO.

But write that NO 99 times.

it hardly takes 9-10 minutes to write 99 No's

u fuckin kiddin me...hw dare u ask such a thing to be done in the first place...am not ur servant tht i will write 99 times no...

EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER

Anurag wrote:

EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER

Are you crazy?

Not expected from you Deep.

Throw Me Out wrote:

bchattopadhyay wrote:

Throw Me Out wrote:i don't mind any team saying NO.

But write that NO 99 times.

it hardly takes 9-10 minutes to write 99 No's

u fuckin kiddin me...hw dare u ask such a thing to be done in the first place...am not ur servant tht i will write 99 times no...

when did i take your name?????????????????

did i ever mentioned your name???

cosmos is written clearly, no ones name is written in main post

(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).

Neeraj wrote:

Throw Me Out wrote:

bchattopadhyay wrote:

Throw Me Out wrote:i don't mind any team saying NO.

But write that NO 99 times.

it hardly takes 9-10 minutes to write 99 No's

u fuckin kiddin me...hw dare u ask such a thing to be done in the first place...am not ur servant tht i will write 99 times no...

when did i take your name?????????????????

did i ever mentioned your name???

cosmos is written clearly, no ones name is written in main post

mera naam hai brackets me

Throw Me Out wrote:

bchattopadhyay wrote:

Throw Me Out wrote:i don't mind any team saying NO.

But write that NO 99 times.

it hardly takes 9-10 minutes to write 99 No's

u fuckin kiddin me...hw dare u ask such a thing to be done in the first place...am not ur servant tht i will write 99 times no...

when did i take your name?????????????????

did i ever mentioned your name???

cosmos is written clearly, no ones name is written in main post

Throw Me Out wrote:

Neeraj wrote:

Throw Me Out wrote:

bchattopadhyay wrote:

Throw Me Out wrote:i don't mind any team saying NO.

But write that NO 99 times.

it hardly takes 9-10 minutes to write 99 No's

u fuckin kiddin me...hw dare u ask such a thing to be done in the first place...am not ur servant tht i will write 99 times no...

when did i take your name?????????????????

did i ever mentioned your name???

cosmos is written clearly, no ones name is written in main post

mera naam hai brackets me

woh toh consequences ka example hai

bchattopadhyay wrote:n u expect a member of my team to do this atrocious thg for u ....wats wrong with u today...are u r drunk or wat....