NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
+24
Aqi
Mr. PD
Mad max
sV
Fahad
Ishaq
Fardin Kibria
Eishan
MI
Haseeh
Anurag
ND
Raminder
Parth
Rishabh
Nick
bchattopadhyay
Vighnesh
DKN
Viresh
Saad
Arjun
Bat Cool
Deep Dey
28 posters
Page 2 of 8
Page 2 of 8 • 
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 
NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Tue 17 Jul 2012, 11:18 pm
First topic message reminder :
JUST AS WE SEE ICC GIVES IMPORTANCE TO RECENT PERFORMANCE IN RANKINGS, SINCE CW HAS PASSED 1.5 YEAR, I HAVE THOUGHT OF SAME IDEA.
I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).
I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.
2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.
4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.
5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).
JUST AS WE SEE ICC GIVES IMPORTANCE TO RECENT PERFORMANCE IN RANKINGS, SINCE CW HAS PASSED 1.5 YEAR, I HAVE THOUGHT OF SAME IDEA.
I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).
I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.
2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.
4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.
5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).
Last edited by Throw Me Out on Thu 25 Oct 2012, 6:57 pm; edited 1 time in total
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Wed 18 Jul 2012, 12:16 am
DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:u didn't saw yet na!!!Vignesh wrote:india?DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:its my viewVignesh wrote:whts ur problem,tumara team ka kuch nahi bigade wala tha....over reactDKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:NO from me.
Why u want blow us!!!
i already seen how India suffered due 2 this rule
dats why u talking like dis
go & see test ranking of India
This rules Taking India down & down
lol tum kya chahte ho purane matches ko count kare ????
us hisaab se toh australia hamesha ke liye no.1 ban jayega, koi uske kareeb bhi nahi ja paayega lol
everyone will fight for no.2 spot only
no.1 will be australia then forever
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by DKN Wed 18 Jul 2012, 12:18 am
yes,i was hoping how india will raise in rankingsbchattopadhyay wrote:yeah...i was surprised whn i read tht....must hv been a shock to the system for the men in blue....
den this rule came & bring india 1 more spot down
DKN- Level 30
-
Posts : 30367
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by DKN Wed 18 Jul 2012, 12:19 am
kya!!!3D wrote:DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:u didn't saw yet na!!!Vignesh wrote:india?DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:its my viewVignesh wrote:whts ur problem,tumara team ka kuch nahi bigade wala tha....over reactDKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:NO from me.
Why u want blow us!!!
i already seen how India suffered due 2 this rule
dats why u talking like dis
go & see test ranking of India
This rules Taking India down & down
lol tum kya chahte ho purane matches ko count kare ????
us hisaab se toh australia hamesha ke liye no.1 ban jayega, koi uske kareeb bhi nahi ja paayega lol
everyone will fight for no.2 spot only
no.1 will be australia then forever
abhi aisa chalta toh australia would loose no1 spot in coming months in ODIs
now dey will gain more points
DKN- Level 30
-
Posts : 30367
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Wed 18 Jul 2012, 12:24 am
DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:kya!!!3D wrote:DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:u didn't saw yet na!!!Vignesh wrote:india?DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:its my viewVignesh wrote:whts ur problem,tumara team ka kuch nahi bigade wala tha....over reactDKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:NO from me.
Why u want blow us!!!
i already seen how India suffered due 2 this rule
dats why u talking like dis
go & see test ranking of India
This rules Taking India down & down
lol tum kya chahte ho purane matches ko count kare ????
us hisaab se toh australia hamesha ke liye no.1 ban jayega, koi uske kareeb bhi nahi ja paayega lol
everyone will fight for no.2 spot only
no.1 will be australia then forever
abhi aisa chalta toh australia would loose no1 spot in coming months in ODIs
now dey will gain more points
lol, shayad tumhe pata nahi hai, last 3 yrs mein australia best odi record
they beat eng 6-1 twice
beat india 4-2
cb series jita
beat pakistan 5-0
beat lankans 3-2
beat west indies 4-0
beat nzl 3-2
beat south africa 2-1
won the icc champions trophy
they lost to eng 3-2 and 4-0,sri lanka 2-1.
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by DKN Wed 18 Jul 2012, 12:25 am
yes,their all defeats will be vanished & wins will be added
DKN- Level 30
-
Posts : 30367
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Wed 18 Jul 2012, 12:27 am
DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:yes,their all defeats will be vanished & wins will be added
ARRE BABA
JO DEFEATS MAINE LIKHA HAI,WOH RAHENGE, IT IS A PART OF THESE 3 YRS, IT WILL BE COUNTED
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by DKN Wed 18 Jul 2012, 12:31 am
leave dat3D wrote:DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:yes,their all defeats will be vanished & wins will be added
ARRE BABA
JO DEFEATS MAINE LIKHA HAI,WOH RAHENGE, IT IS A PART OF THESE 3 YRS, IT WILL BE COUNTED
let dem do thier work
DKN- Level 30
-
Posts : 30367
Nick- Level 33
-
Posts : 38834
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Saad Wed 18 Jul 2012, 5:53 pm
But No from Cosmos's SideVillian of CW wrote:Yes!!!
Saad- Level 24
-
Posts : 18073
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Wed 18 Jul 2012, 6:46 pm
Saad Shafi Ahmed wrote:But No from Cosmos's SideVillian of CW wrote:Yes!!!
rish said yes to Nikhil's comment whether india is at 5th or not in test
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 6:44 pm
time to re ignite this thread once again
wait for my modified post
wait for my modified post
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 6:57 pm
JUST AS WE SEE ICC GIVES IMPORTANCE TO RECENT PERFORMANCE IN RANKINGS, SINCE CW HAS PASSED 1.5 YEAR, I HAVE THOUGHT OF SAME IDEA.
I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).
I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.
2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.
4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.
5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).
I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).
I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.
2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.
4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.
5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:00 pm
NEED QUICK REPLIES FROM ABOVE MENTIONED TEAMS
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
DKN- Level 30
-
Posts : 30367
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:11 pm
DKN wrote:Dadagiri to get 'YES'
it has to be either your way or my way
if its my way, then you have to say yes
if it has to be your way, penalty has to paid
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by bchattopadhyay Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:14 pm
wat is this...already we told tht we are not accepting this method at all...thr will be substantial fall of our odi rank n so also for t20 rank...so no way we can accept this chg... 
bchattopadhyay- Level 23
-
Posts : 17537
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Parth Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:16 pm
bchattopadhyay wrote:wat is this...already we told tht we are not accepting this method at all...thr will be substantial fall of our odi rank n so also for t20 rank...so no way we can accept this chg...
vapis padho
shayad tum kuch chuk gae 
Parth- Level 26
-
Posts : 23020
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:17 pm
bchattopadhyay wrote:wat is this...already we told tht we are not accepting this method at all...thr will be substantial fall of our odi rank n so also for t20 rank...so no way we can accept this chg...
17th july ko bola tha
now its 25th october
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
DKN- Level 30
-
Posts : 30367
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by DKN Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:18 pm
better luck next yr :lol:Throw Me Out wrote:bchattopadhyay wrote:wat is this...already we told tht we are not accepting this method at all...thr will be substantial fall of our odi rank n so also for t20 rank...so no way we can accept this chg...
17th july ko bola tha
now its 25th october
DKN- Level 30
-
Posts : 30367
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by bchattopadhyay Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:19 pm
so wat..u ar tryin to play sm sick joke like zak or wat...i dont care wat is written above...
bchattopadhyay- Level 23
-
Posts : 17537
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Raminder Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:20 pm
DKN wrote:SH already refused too
Who said ?
We want this !
We won't be at last then atleast !
Raminder- Level 25
-
Posts : 21735
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Thu 25 Oct 2012, 7:20 pm
i don't mind any team saying NO.
But write that NO 99 times.
it hardly takes 9-10 minutes to write 99 No's
But write that NO 99 times.
it hardly takes 9-10 minutes to write 99 No's
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Page 2 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Page 2 of 8
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|
