NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
+24
Aqi
Mr. PD
Mad max
sV
Fahad
Ishaq
Fardin Kibria
Eishan
MI
Haseeh
Anurag
ND
Raminder
Parth
Rishabh
Nick
bchattopadhyay
Vighnesh
DKN
Viresh
Saad
Arjun
Bat Cool
Deep Dey
28 posters
Page 8 of 8
Page 8 of 8 • 
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Tue 17 Jul 2012, 11:18 pm
First topic message reminder :
JUST AS WE SEE ICC GIVES IMPORTANCE TO RECENT PERFORMANCE IN RANKINGS, SINCE CW HAS PASSED 1.5 YEAR, I HAVE THOUGHT OF SAME IDEA.
I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).
I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.
2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.
4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.
5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).
JUST AS WE SEE ICC GIVES IMPORTANCE TO RECENT PERFORMANCE IN RANKINGS, SINCE CW HAS PASSED 1.5 YEAR, I HAVE THOUGHT OF SAME IDEA.
I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).
I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.
2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.
4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.
5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).
Last edited by Throw Me Out on Thu 25 Oct 2012, 6:57 pm; edited 1 time in total
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Tue 04 Dec 2012, 12:22 pm
Šv wrote:Will the World end first or the rankings come out first ?
FIKAR NOT
NARAK JAANE SE PEHLE RANKING DEKE JAAUNGA
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Mad max Tue 04 Dec 2012, 12:43 pm
Throw Me Out wrote:Šv wrote:Will the World end first or the rankings come out first ?
FIKAR NOT
NARAK JAANE SE PEHLE RANKING DEKE JAAUNGA
Lol
Narak aaj hi jaayega kya ?????
Mad max- Level 24
-
Posts : 19728
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Tue 04 Dec 2012, 12:45 pm
MadMax wrote:Throw Me Out wrote:Šv wrote:Will the World end first or the rankings come out first ?
FIKAR NOT
NARAK JAANE SE PEHLE RANKING DEKE JAAUNGA
Lol
Narak aaj hi jaayega kya ?????
nah
21st dec ko toh jaana hi hai
uske pehle update kar dunga
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Rishabh- Level 36
-
Posts : 46791
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Mr. PD Sat 29 Dec 2012, 10:39 pm
Ya cha kay zala????
Deep tu navin System banav naar hota na... mag kay zala?
Deep tu navin System banav naar hota na... mag kay zala?
Mr. PD- Level 7
-
Posts : 378
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Sat 29 Dec 2012, 10:41 pm
Mr. PD wrote:Ya cha kay zala????
Deep tu navin System banav naar hota na... mag kay zala?
RANKINGS DE TOH DIYA HAI ROUGHLY
PURA DISTRIBUTION, BATAUNGA EK BAAR 2ND STRING TEAM KA PROBLEM SOLVE KAR LU
I HAVE TO CALCULATE SKILLS OF ALL TEAMS, TIME NAHI MIL RAHA TO UPDATE THE RANKINGS
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Mr. PD Sat 29 Dec 2012, 10:46 pm
12 to 3 AM me Moderation ke badle vo kaam karleThrow Me Out wrote:Mr. PD wrote:Ya cha kay zala????
Deep tu navin System banav naar hota na... mag kay zala?
RANKINGS DE TOH DIYA HAI ROUGHLY
PURA DISTRIBUTION, BATAUNGA EK BAAR 2ND STRING TEAM KA PROBLEM SOLVE KAR LU
I HAVE TO CALCULATE SKILLS OF ALL TEAMS, TIME NAHI MIL RAHA TO UPDATE THE RANKINGS
Mr. PD- Level 7
-
Posts : 378
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Deep Dey Sat 29 Dec 2012, 10:47 pm
Mr. PD wrote:12 to 3 AM me Moderation ke badle vo kaam karleThrow Me Out wrote:Mr. PD wrote:Ya cha kay zala????
Deep tu navin System banav naar hota na... mag kay zala?
RANKINGS DE TOH DIYA HAI ROUGHLY
PURA DISTRIBUTION, BATAUNGA EK BAAR 2ND STRING TEAM KA PROBLEM SOLVE KAR LU
I HAVE TO CALCULATE SKILLS OF ALL TEAMS, TIME NAHI MIL RAHA TO UPDATE THE RANKINGS
MAI 3AM KO ONLINE NAHI REHTA
AUR 1 WEEK SE KOI MODERATION NAHI KIYA
THATS WHY EVERYONES POST ARE SAFE
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Rishabh Sat 29 Dec 2012, 11:05 pm
Throw Me Out wrote:Mr. PD wrote:12 to 3 AM me Moderation ke badle vo kaam karleThrow Me Out wrote:Mr. PD wrote:Ya cha kay zala????
Deep tu navin System banav naar hota na... mag kay zala?
RANKINGS DE TOH DIYA HAI ROUGHLY
PURA DISTRIBUTION, BATAUNGA EK BAAR 2ND STRING TEAM KA PROBLEM SOLVE KAR LU
I HAVE TO CALCULATE SKILLS OF ALL TEAMS, TIME NAHI MIL RAHA TO UPDATE THE RANKINGS
MAI 3AM KO ONLINE NAHI REHTA
AUR 1 WEEK SE KOI MODERATION NAHI KIYA
THATS WHY EVERYONES POST ARE SAFE
Ohh tabhi toh mein sochun ki posts meri posts badti jaa rhi hai..
Rishabh- Level 36
-
Posts : 46791
sV- Level 48
-
Posts : 71137
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Anurag Fri 04 Jan 2013, 1:39 am
T20 Rankings decide bhi ho gayi :OŠv wrote:And time has passed by
Anurag- Level 31
-
Posts : 33149
Aqi- Level 32
-
Posts : 37071
Vighnesh- Level 35
-
Posts : 44018
ND- Level 24
-
Posts : 18544
Ashu- Level 28
-
Posts : 27189
ND- Level 24
-
Posts : 18544
Nishchal- Level 28
-
Posts : 26828
Jeethu Sehwag- Level 10
-
Posts : 1001
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Nishchal Sun 20 Jan 2013, 5:37 pm
nothing :bitch:Jeetharam wrote:what is going in this thread?
Nishchal- Level 28
-
Posts : 26828
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
by Jeethu Sehwag Sun 20 Jan 2013, 5:38 pm
Nishchal wrote:nothingJeetharam wrote:what is going in this thread?
nothing?
Jeethu Sehwag- Level 10
-
Posts : 1001
Matt121- Level 1
-
Posts : 22
Vighnesh- Level 35
-
Posts : 44018
Page 8 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Page 8 of 8
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|
