NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS

by Deep Dey Tue 17 Jul 2012, 11:18 pm

First topic message reminder :

JUST AS WE SEE ICC GIVES IMPORTANCE TO RECENT PERFORMANCE IN RANKINGS, SINCE CW HAS PASSED 1.5 YEAR, I HAVE THOUGHT OF SAME IDEA.

I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).

I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)

THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.

NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.

2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.

FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.

3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.

4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.

5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).

by Nick Wed 31 Oct 2012, 10:32 am

Stog diggng threads :O

by **Parth** Wed 31 Oct 2012, 10:35 am

NICK wrote:Stog diggng threads

its not digging

i havnt posted in at thread which is in History forum :O

by **Fahad** Wed 31 Oct 2012, 12:00 pm

RANKINGS ARE REFREASHED SO NOW THIS METHOD WE CAN FOLLOW

by Deep Dey Wed 31 Oct 2012, 2:42 pm

Fahad wrote:RANKINGS ARE REFREASHED SO NOW THIS METHOD WE CAN FOLLOW

method???

which method??

i haven't mentioned any method

i myself don't know the method Emo

by Viresh Wed 31 Oct 2012, 4:08 pm

Ranking refreshed? :O
What do you mean by that?

by **Rishabh** Wed 31 Oct 2012, 4:33 pm

Throw Me Out wrote:
Fahad wrote:RANKINGS ARE REFREASHED SO NOW THIS METHOD WE CAN FOLLOW

method???

which method??

i haven't mentioned any method

i myself don't know the method