NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
+24
Aqi
Mr. PD
Mad max
sV
Fahad
Ishaq
Fardin Kibria
Eishan
MI
Haseeh
Anurag
ND
Raminder
Parth
Rishabh
Nick
bchattopadhyay
Vighnesh
DKN
Viresh
Saad
Arjun
Bat Cool
Deep Dey
28 posters
Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
JUST AS WE SEE ICC GIVES IMPORTANCE TO RECENT PERFORMANCE IN RANKINGS, SINCE CW HAS PASSED 1.5 YEAR, I HAVE THOUGHT OF SAME IDEA.
I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).
I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.
2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.
4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.
5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).
I WILL TRY RESEARCH TO DEVISE A METHOD WHICH WILL GIVE WEIGHTAGE BASED ON RECENT PERFORMANCE (FTP 3).
I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THE TEAMS COSMOS(1ST IN T20 & 2ND IN OD), WARRIORS(1ST IN OD & 3RD IN T20), THUNDERBOLTS (3RD IN OD), WORLD DOMINATORS (2ND IN T20)
THE APPROVAL OF OWNERS WERE TAKEN WHEN NEW RANKING METHOD WAS DEVISED HERE, BECAUSE OF WHICH DOMINATORS LOST THEIR NO.1 SPOT IN OD.
NOTES:
1.ANY TEAM MEMBER OF RESPECTIVE TEAMS MENTIONED ABOVE HAS TO REPLY IN YES OR NO. (DO NOT GIVE JUSTIFICATION, I HATE THOSE).
BETTER DISCUSS WITH YOUR TEAM OWNER THOROUGHLY, THERE SHOULD NOT BE CONTRADICTION BETWEEN OWNERS AND TEAM MEMBERS LATER OR ITS BETTER ONLY OWNERS REPLY.
2.THE TEAM WHO SAYS 'NO' WILL HAVE TO WRITE 'NO', EXACTLY & EXACTLY & EXACTLY 99 TIMES IN VERTICAL ORDER LIKE:
NO
NO
NO
.
.
.
FAILING TO WHICH THAT TEAMS VOTE WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
3.NO TEAM SHOULD EVEN THINK OF TEASING THE OTHER TEAM WHO SAYS NO.
4. YOU CAN ALWAYS CHANGE FROM NO TO YES, BUT REVERSE CAN'T BE DONE, THAT IS ONCE YOU SAY, IT STAYS YES.
5.IF YOU BREAK ANY OF THE RULES FROM THE ABOVE 4, YOU WILL MAKE ME ANGRY & AS A CONSEQUENCE OF IT, ......................(BETTER ASK NEERAJ OR ANY OTHER BOLTS MEMBER).
Last edited by Throw Me Out on Thu 25 Oct 2012, 6:57 pm; edited 1 time in total
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
2D wrote:so only them and if they say yes it's done?
because they are at 1 and 2
other old teams like dynamos and silent assassins and warriors(in 20-20) won't reach at top even after adjustments
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
no but what if other teams disagree with this idea? ;)
NOT SAYING I AM NOT AGREEING JUST ASKING?
NOT SAYING I AM NOT AGREEING JUST ASKING?
Bat Cool- Level 32
-
Posts : 36398
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
2D wrote:no but what if other teams disagree with this idea? ;)
NOT SAYING I AM NOT AGREEING JUST ASKING?
there are only 5 teams, remaining 3 doesnt matter, their RP wont change anyways
cosmos
SA
RW
WD
Dynamos
Only these matters
SA and Dynamos Rankings go to the top anyways as the difference this tooooooooooooooooo large.
thats what i said cosmos will remain no.1 in 20-20 but their RP may fall
in OD, it is possible they may loose their spot like dominators lost when i brought this method
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
Viresh(Nick Fury) wrote:Sorry NO
OK IDEA THRASHED
AJ AND SAAD NO NEED TO THINK NOW
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:NO from me.
Why u want blow us!!!
Blow
what blow
kaha toh hai, your's RP wont change
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
Anyhow this can't be apply dis year3D wrote:DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:NO from me.
Why u want blow us!!!
Blow
what blow
kaha toh hai, your's RP wont change
as only 1 yr record u have
DKN- Level 30
-
Posts : 30367
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:Anyhow this can't be apply dis year3D wrote:DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:NO from me.
Why u want blow us!!!
Blow
what blow
kaha toh hai, your's RP wont change
as only 1 yr record u have
lol
i can create my own mathematics to include
remember that case 1 and case 2 for the teams who played less matches , it is actually my mathematics, i am its copy right holder, ICC has nothing to do with
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
whts ur problem,tumara team ka kuch nahi bigade wala tha....over reactDKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:NO from me.
Why u want blow us!!!
Vighnesh- Level 35
-
Posts : 44018
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
it would be good
But du to Viresh's No
All FInished
But du to Viresh's No
All FInished
Saad- Level 24
-
Posts : 18073
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
LOL
u can try in january 13 with 6 month record & rest ur predition
u can try in january 13 with 6 month record & rest ur predition
DKN- Level 30
-
Posts : 30367
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
its my viewVignesh wrote:whts ur problem,tumara team ka kuch nahi bigade wala tha....over reactDKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:NO from me.
Why u want blow us!!!
i already seen how India suffered due 2 this rule
DKN- Level 30
-
Posts : 30367
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:its my viewVignesh wrote:whts ur problem,tumara team ka kuch nahi bigade wala tha....over reactDKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:NO from me.
Why u want blow us!!!
i already seen how India suffered due 2 this rule
lol
tumhara kuch nahi bigde ga baba,jo hoga sirf older teams ka hoga lol.
jyada change nahi
Cosmos RP will down further, they will remain no.1 in t20 and but can't gurantee about that in od
dynamos ka RP may rise by 1-2, SA will be unchanged mostly
Warriors ka thoda rise hoga say like 2-4, Dominators may loose 2-3 RP
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
yes bro,i can understand3D wrote:DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:its my viewVignesh wrote:whts ur problem,tumara team ka kuch nahi bigade wala tha....over reactDKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:NO from me.
Why u want blow us!!!
i already seen how India suffered due 2 this rule
lol
tumhara kuch nahi bigde ga baba,jo hoga sirf older teams ka hoga lol.
jyada change nahi
Cosmos RP will down further, they will remain no.1 in t20 and but can't gurantee about that in od
dynamos ka RP may rise by 1-2, SA will be unchanged mostly
Warriors ka thoda rise hoga say like 2-4, Dominators may loose 2-3 RP
just i don't like d rule,not about result
DKN- Level 30
-
Posts : 30367
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
india?DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:its my viewVignesh wrote:whts ur problem,tumara team ka kuch nahi bigade wala tha....over reactDKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:NO from me.
Why u want blow us!!!
i already seen how India suffered due 2 this rule
Vighnesh- Level 35
-
Posts : 44018
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
Vignesh wrote:india?DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:its my viewVignesh wrote:whts ur problem,tumara team ka kuch nahi bigade wala tha....over reactDKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:NO from me.
Why u want blow us!!!
i already seen how India suffered due 2 this rule
arre india 5th pe chala gaya na because aug 2008 se aug 2009 ke beech ke test matches wiped out ho gaye rankings se
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
u didn't saw yet na!!!Vignesh wrote:india?DKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:its my viewVignesh wrote:whts ur problem,tumara team ka kuch nahi bigade wala tha....over reactDKN {RORSCHACH} wrote:NO from me.
Why u want blow us!!!
i already seen how India suffered due 2 this rule
dats why u talking like dis
go & see test ranking of India
This rules Taking India down & down
DKN- Level 30
-
Posts : 30367
Re: NEW IDEA FOR RANKINGS
yeah...i was surprised whn i read tht....must hv been a shock to the system for the men in blue....
bchattopadhyay- Level 23
-
Posts : 17537
Page 1 of 8 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Page 1 of 8
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum