SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

by Deep Dey Wed 21 Dec 2011, 9:21 pm

First topic message reminder :

Ceat Cricket Ratings was the 1st International Cricket Rating System.
Since none of us have the time to find out who won the matches at what point of the series/tournament etc etc,I have used Ceat System to come to a starting point.
Taking all the ODI matches into consideration before CWC December,I have made the following table:
1.6 pts have been given for each win.
2.0 pts for each loss(No way on Earth negative pts can be given)
3.Bonus points for Series / Tournament wins has been given on the basis of no. of Teams participating in the event. For e.g. two teams = 2 points, Triangular = 3 points, Quadrangular = 4 points and so on
4.Series + P = Total no. of matches before CWC + Total no. of series
5.To adjust the Rating Points wrt ICC Ratings,a multiplying factor of 25 is used: Overall Pts=[(Wins*6*25)+(BP*25)], Rating Pts=Overall Pts/(Series+P).

Team Name	P	W	L	Overall Pts	Rating Pts	Series W,L	Series+P
Cosmos	15	10	5	1625	90	2,1	18
Hawks	15	8	7	1325	74	2,1	18
Dominators	15	8	7	950	72	2,1	18
Warriors	14	7	7	1100	65	1,2	17
Dynamos	14	6	8	950	56	1,2	17
Champions	15	6	9	950	53	1,2	18
Strikers	5	2	3	300	50	0,1	6
Superstars	5	2	3	300	50	0,1	6
Mafia	0	0	0	0	0	0,0	0
Dragons	0	0	0	0	0	0,0	0

Now,I suggest to use ICC's Rating System with little modification that ICC's System doesn't give BP in ODI's,but we will give it.
RP=Rating Points
A Series will be counted as 1 match.
If the gap between the RP of the 2 teams before the start of the match is fewer than 40 points, then:
a.The winner scores 50 points more than the opponent's RP
b.The loser scores 50 points fewer than the opponent's RP
c.Each team in a tie scores the opponent's RP

B.If the gap between the RP of the two teams before the start of the match is more than or equal to 40 points, then :
a.The winner, if it is the stronger team, scores 10 points more than its own RP
b.The winner, if it is the weaker team, scores 90 points more than its RP
c.The loser, if it is the stronger team, scores 90 points fewer than its RP
d.The loser, if it is the weaker team, scores 10 points fewer than its own RP
e.The stronger team in a tie scores 40 points fewer than its own RP
f.The weaker team in a tie scores 40 points more than its own RP

In the 2nd Case stronger team means the team with higher RP.
BP will be awarded only for winning the series/tournament at last:
Bonus points for Series / Tournament wins has been given on the basis of no. of Teams participating in the event. For e.g. two teams = 2 points,
Triangular = 3 points, Quadrangular = 4 points and so on.
BP will be multiplied by 25 to adjust to ICC Ratings.This BP*25 will be added to the Match Points.

Calculate the points for a match add it to previous overall points,then divide by (Series + P).Note: Count the series only after it ends.
eg:cosmos won vs superstar in CWC.
Before start of the match the difference between their RP was 40,so 2nd case will be used:
Hence, points for Cosmos=10+90=100, Points for SS=50-10=40
These pts will be added to previous overall pts.
Hence,now Overall pts for Cosmos= 1625+100=1725,Overall pts for SS=300+40=340
To get rating Pts, for Cosmos= overall points/19, for SS=overall pts/7
Note:The number of matches taken here: its 19 & 7 not 15 & 5.i hope you got it what i am trying to say here.
So suppose SS gets eliminated in the 1st round itself,2 matches should be considered at the end of their last match in the event & not 1.

Case 1: If it is not implemented- No Problem.
Case 2: If it is implemented,atleast 2 more people should know this method in case my PC is damaged,they will do that job as I don't use Cell phone,I won't be able to connect anytime.You have to concentrate on only the part which is highlighted in BOLD above.

This Calculation hardly requires a time:

If calculation done scientific Calci or normal calci or PC calci or Mobile calci or any other device,it hardly takes 1-2 minutes to find & recheck the calculation
If calculation is done by mental methods,Abacus,Logarithm Table,Vedic maths or any other method,it will take hardly 5-6 minutes to find and recheck the
calcuation.

SAME METHOD FOR T20 ALSO. I Haven't Prepared the table yet

by zaki Thu 22 Dec 2011, 4:35 am

hope one day we can go at the top too

by zaki Thu 22 Dec 2011, 4:35 am

but thats really hard because we have a lot of strong teams in this site now

by zaki Thu 22 Dec 2011, 4:36 am

but we will not loose hope we will try out best every match we play

by Mad max Thu 22 Dec 2011, 7:18 am

Well
Deep you can implement this

WE AGREE FOR THIS
even if we loose ranking we have faith that we can get it back

and Awesome work Deep
Mr.Scientist

by Akshay RKstar Thu 22 Dec 2011, 10:41 am

Wonderfull job Expert Deep Happy

by **Aqi** Thu 22 Dec 2011, 11:15 am

Deep Rocker

by Fardin Kibria Thu 22 Dec 2011, 11:15 am

Aqi stop stating the obvious

by Akshay RKstar Thu 22 Dec 2011, 11:16 am

Fardin(Mr. Perfection) wrote:Aqi stop stating the obvious

well caught Happy

by Fardin Kibria Thu 22 Dec 2011, 11:17 am

Caught red handed

by **Aqi** Thu 22 Dec 2011, 11:19 am

ha ha Deep Demon Happy

by Nick Thu 22 Dec 2011, 11:34 am

IncreDIBLE WORK FRM DEEP..

by Nick Thu 22 Dec 2011, 11:37 am

I saw tis thread yestrday itself,bt by seeing the descriptn i thought tis was smethng els

by Deep Dey Thu 22 Dec 2011, 1:21 pm

Will Produce the T20 and Odi by tomorrow

by Deep Dey Thu 22 Dec 2011, 6:40 pm

Job have started .

In 59 hrs from now on,Results will come up

by Eishan Thu 22 Dec 2011, 7:05 pm

Deep Dey wrote:
bchattopadhyay wrote:phew just finished 2 things...
readin it n understandin it n came to only one conclusion...

borda bapok idea...haar heem kore dewa idea n concept...

awesm work dada...;)

Struggle for 5 days to make with logical sense.
If I was here since the beginning of cricism , it would have been even more shorter.

i promised Eishan for this 4 days ago.Got it delayed by 2 days

i knew buddy when i was assigning works . this job couldnt have been done in more better way then this.. awesome work n u kept your promise Smile

incredible work Smile

also i would like to ask so wats been finalised? Case A or Case B ?

by Eishan Thu 22 Dec 2011, 7:06 pm

SJ wrote:Well
Deep you can implement this

WE AGREE FOR THIS
even if we loose ranking we have faith that we can get it back

and Awesome work Deep
Mr.Scientist

thats true sportmenship brother Smile

i seriously think u can really cover up watver may be the difference aftr its been adopted Smile

by Deep Dey Thu 22 Dec 2011, 7:10 pm

Eishan Jain wrote:
Deep Dey wrote:
bchattopadhyay wrote:phew just finished 2 things...
readin it n understandin it n came to only one conclusion...

borda bapok idea...haar heem kore dewa idea n concept...

awesm work dada...;)

Struggle for 5 days to make with logical sense.
If I was here since the beginning of cricism , it would have been even more shorter.

i promised Eishan for this 4 days ago.Got it delayed by 2 days
i knew buddy when i was assigning works . this job couldnt have been done in more better way then this.. awesome work n u kept your promise
incredible work

also i would like to ask so wats been finalised? Case A or Case B ?

Both case will be used

Rankings depend on what type of opposition you play.
Case A suggests if you play a team with equal strength then follow this.
Case B suggests if you play a team with too much difference follow this(like when news are playing,so they have 0 pts now.According to that,they are weak teams)

by Eishan Thu 22 Dec 2011, 7:11 pm

hmmm good job then Smile

will help new teams to quickly gain equivalent points to old teams .. they dont have to play so many matches. just need to play better Smile

by Viresh Thu 22 Dec 2011, 7:13 pm

Yes
But who goona manage it in the absence of u

by Deep Dey Thu 22 Dec 2011, 7:13 pm

Thats why I made,so that we can have fluctuation in pts every day after every match.

by Deep Dey Thu 22 Dec 2011, 7:15 pm

Yo Yo wrote:Yes
But who goona manage it in the absence of u

well thats the question,I will be available unless my PC gets damaged.

NRR is different thing as it is for small time.If I am not there ,SV can use his method.
Ranking is different it will be followed forever.

It is very simple to calculate.

I have made it even simpler now in my new thread
http://www.cwforums.net/t2270-cw-rankings#155334

Don't comment and Read in that thread now before 59 hrs get over

by Eishan Thu 22 Dec 2011, 7:18 pm

well sourav got the method n deep made it so we have 2 members.. i got the basics of it. but wont be sure unless i do it actually. so i guess its done Smile

by Deep Dey Thu 22 Dec 2011, 7:24 pm

@Eishan

I have made it even more simpler now.
Just wait 58 hrs .
Then Read the new one.

Just skipped one point from the above because I am master in calculating it but I cannot expect that everyone will be mastered in that.so have made it a bit simpler for everyone's understanding. Happy

If I wish,I could have made even more tougher,but have to respect the limitations of others also Happy

.

I haven't used the entire ICC's method here,just used 80% of what they do

by **Rishabh** Thu 22 Dec 2011, 7:24 pm

Deep is the feature Admin for sure because of his great work.

Hats off buddy.

by Deep Dey Thu 22 Dec 2011, 7:25 pm

@eishan

Just wait 58 hrs

then look here:
http://www.cwforums.net/t2270-cw-rankings#155334

by Sponsored content

SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.

Re: SAY YES OR NO FROM HEART 1st then ask Query.No Justification Required.