Fighting Zone-2 !

First topic message reminder :

Seems there are many fights going on in CW..so better i thought of Creating a Fight zone.

But got an idea instead of fighting with utter rubbish words and meaningless sentences do fight with some meaningful words and sentences..

that takes ur revenge and adds some FM to ur account and also shows other members how much Cricket knowledge u have got.

Fight on a particular topic.

Now i hope all are clear..

this is just like a debate..The last time when i put up this it flopped

but this time it wont i suppose

So i put this up again infront of u guys

I will decide the Topic
Deep will decide the winner

You guys decide against whom u want to FIGHT..

now its clear to all of u


Thank you /-
MadMax

9th Topic



9.Took Wickets of Tailenders wasnt upto his mark i feel this was a bad selection

If not Harbhajan Then which spinner should had played this series
and
IF harbhajan then why ?

DEADLINE 9 PM IST Nov 26 2012

Lol.. Avg again belongs to Murali and its not Murali mistake as he played less matches vs ENG.. And for your info 14 tests is not very less

Which Team Is Better
Eng Or Zim/Ban

No doubt England but there were 6 to 7 other teams too in cricket not only England

S Warne is far better
as he did in Australian pitches

Bowling stats vs lower order (last 3)
Murali 139 wicketes
Warne 184 Wicketes
Warner often clean the tail

in how much balls ?

I dont know but i thing is sure out of 700 wicketes of warne around 200were of tailenders

i wanted 2 bowl leg spin 1st
but too much pressure on muscles
very difficult

Shane Warne! No arguments!

wow 2 Threads :bitch:

Vignesh wrote:wow 2 Threads :bitch:

that one reached 70 pages

Not Debating on this topic :O
They both are Great :O

Warne is better than Murali
I will fight tmrw upon this topic :bitch:

Where is Sai n Ankush?

sai is busy

Cant debate on the topic
Very Tough
But i say murli is better than warne

Shane Warne!

Muttiah Muralitharan

The lone fighter of Lanka for many years...

Time up

Deadline over

result at night

wer is the result??

he tld result at nite :FU:

No result...no new topic

rsult at nite
new topic.tommo

haseeh wrote:My Vote goes to Muralidharan..he stand all in team even there weren't such support from teamates and Warne done the things when there were many quality quicks in team

Ok good point, but he had the support of vass and few of other bowlers who didn't make any significant mark in international cricket.

viresh wrote:I hate Chucker

he was bowling within rules

haseeh wrote:800 wicketes from less matches were better 700

So?????????????????

Sai wrote:800 WICKETs in SPINNER Friendly pitches and on SQUARE TURNERS

700 WICKETS ON GREENISH TINGE PITCHES and FAST PITCHES IN THE WORLD

GET TO KNOW DIFFERENCE

Thats the point.

Murali has played few matches only in Australia,england, South Africa,west Indies,New Zeland Though, + He has good averages and SR in SA,Eng,WI,NZL (except australia, where he has horrible record), he couldn't leave his mark there.


+
You got to admire the fact that Shane picked his all wickets(Test,odi) by conventional orthodox leg spin, while Murali picked wickets with his Doosra (which is non conventional).

MI wrote:Murali Doesnt SPin The ball As Much as Warne Does

true enough, have seen myself

SJ wrote:Murali got 800 wickets just Beacause RULES WERE KEPT ASIDE AND CHANGED JUST BECAUSE OF HIM

OTHERWISE HE WOULDNT EVEN HAVE GOT 1 WICKET IN INTL CRICKET

Let me tell you, Before Murali started bowling Doosra, he had picked up many wickets in oDI and Test,
you cannot say he wouldn't have taken wickets if rules hadn't been changed.


Rules were not changed for him, for years and years biomechanics of older bowlers were and it was found that many of them were throwing, they found it was not possible to with 7 degree criteria,so it was changed.

It was tried and tested and verified.

Moreover, you complain about Murali's action, it was proven scientifically , that its mere optical illusion of the observer, he was bowling within 15 degree rule.

His right shoulder to right forearm is not normal, he had some inborn defect in it which was actually helping him to bowl doosra.

Haseeh wrote:Mcgrath + Lee + gillespie + Bicheal etc.. There for support Warne.. And whats there for murali..only vaas weren't any other

How many tests bichel played??????? Not even 20

Was it warne's mistake take that Mcgrath and lee and gillespie were also great bowlers.
+
you are forgetting that nobody is born great.

when Lee started playing, did anyone knew that he was going to be great bowler just after 1-2 matches///

How many times lee and warne played together???????? not much
Lee played just 76 matches and 221 odis from which there are matches that were played after warne retired, there are matches which were played when warne was banned for 1 year.

There was also times that when warne played but lee missed out due to injury as we know lee was prone to injury.

So only Mcgrath and gillespie was there.

I cannot understand this logic of which he had support of great bowlers.
if tomorrow we are going to judge who is greatest fast bowler and if i say its Mcgrath, then you will say Mcgrath had the support of warne. :shock: :shock: :shock:

what kind of logic is that????

when we judge warne, we say he had support of mcgrath, gillespie and when we judge mcgrath we will say he had support of warne

strange

so the winner?