Fighting Zone-2 !

First topic message reminder :

Seems there are many fights going on in CW..so better i thought of Creating a Fight zone.

But got an idea instead of fighting with utter rubbish words and meaningless sentences do fight with some meaningful words and sentences..

that takes ur revenge and adds some FM to ur account and also shows other members how much Cricket knowledge u have got.

Fight on a particular topic.

Now i hope all are clear..

this is just like a debate..The last time when i put up this it flopped

but this time it wont i suppose

So i put this up again infront of u guys

I will decide the Topic
Deep will decide the winner

You guys decide against whom u want to FIGHT..

now its clear to all of u


Thank you /-
MadMax

9th Topic



9.Took Wickets of Tailenders wasnt upto his mark i feel this was a bad selection

If not Harbhajan Then which spinner should had played this series
and
IF harbhajan then why ?

DEADLINE 9 PM IST Nov 26 2012

Warne Have Dismissed Trescothick 8 times :O

MI wrote:

Arjun wrote:BOTH MURALI AND WARNE ARE GREATS ANDD I PREFER MURALI

ANYONE WANNA FITE??

ME :O

Y U PREFER WARNE??

Haseeh wrote:And one more thing in ODI Murali is far better then Warne..
Have much more wicketes + 5 wicket haul and much more

See the thing is SIMPLE as that Murali played on SUB CONTIENT PITCHES WHICH ARE SPINNER FRIENDLY SO ITS OBVIOUS THAT A SPINNER GETS WICKETS

EVEN KUMBLE IS BETTER IF U CONSIDER THAT CASE BUT the THING IS Warne picked Wickets in some different Conditions

Murali's action was doubtful and ACCORDING TO RULES HE IS NOT ALLEGIBLE TO BOWL EVEN

I dont wanna say this again because Deep says that i am repeating again and again

He doesnt see that you guys are making to repeat again

Arjun wrote:

MI wrote:

Arjun wrote:BOTH MURALI AND WARNE ARE GREATS ANDD I PREFER MURALI

ANYONE WANNA FITE??

ME :O

Y U PREFER WARNE??

He played a major role in worldcups in which aus won :O

and many mre :O

Madmax you mean Murali haven't bowled well in Eng,NZ and SA..
IN England
6
48
19.20
IN New Zealand
6
30
19.96
In South Africa
6
35
26.02

MadMax wrote:

Haseeh wrote:And one more thing in ODI Murali is far better then Warne..
Have much more wicketes + 5 wicket haul and much more

See the thing is SIMPLE as that Murali played on SUB CONTIENT PITCHES WHICH ARE SPINNER FRIENDLY SO ITS OBVIOUS THAT A SPINNER GETS WICKETS

EVEN KUMBLE IS BETTER IF U CONSIDER THAT CASE BUT the THING IS Warne picked Wickets in some different Conditions

Murali's action was doubtful and ACCORDING TO RULES HE IS NOT ALLEGIBLE TO BOWL EVEN

I dont wanna say this again because Deep says that i am repeating again and again

He doesnt see that you guys are making to repeat again

He doesnt see that you guys are making to repeat again

will reply to this while judging

remember Indian batsman played Murali very well
Especially MS in 2011 WC Final

Take in General..who was best successful againist INDIA your Warne?

Haseeh wrote:Madmax you mean Murali haven't bowled well in Eng,NZ and SA..
IN England
6
48
19.20
IN New Zealand
6
30
19.96
In South Africa
6
35
26.02

Indian batsman played well against murali

Haseeh wrote:

remember Indian batsman played Murali very well
Especially MS in 2011 WC Final

Take in General..who was best successful againist INDIA your Warne?

It Would Be Warne :O
But He Played Just A Few MAtch With India :O

remember Indian batsman played Murali very well
Especially MS in 2011 WC Final

Indian batsman played well against murali

Records against India
Muttiah Muralitharan
22
105
32.61
Shane Warne
14
43
47.18
Still you guys says Warne is far better againist india

Haseeh wrote:

remember Indian batsman played Murali very well
Especially MS in 2011 WC Final

Indian batsman played well against murali

Records against India
Muttiah Muralitharan
22
105
32.61
Shane Warne
14
43
47.18
Still you guys says Warne is far better againist india

Warne Playd Very less matches against india

Less matches
So What?
Average is there na ! Check it..
Warne had only a 5wkt haul in 14 tests againist india.poor then murali

Haseeh wrote:Less matches
So What?
Average is there na ! Check it..
Warne had only a 5wkt haul in 14 tests againist india.poor then murali

Lol then Check Warne Stats Vs England :O

LOl Murali Played a lot of matches with low ranked team :O

Warne haven't often plays against Eng as Warne does.and i dont have stats of that with me but in england both have comparable avg ..

Haseeh wrote:Warne haven't often plays against Eng as Warne does.and i dont have stats of that with me but in england both have comparable avg ..

In the same way Warne Did Not Play much matches against england :O

and stats says Both Did Nt bowl well against the indians :O

LOl Murali Played a lot of matches with low ranked team

Not his mistake :bitch:
Even if you neglected that Murali will stand above Warne in Stats

Haseeh wrote:

LOl Murali Played a lot of matches with low ranked team

Not his mistake :bitch:
Even if you neglected that Murali will stand above Warne in Stats

Letz take in the other way
if warne would play as much as murali played against zimbave and all :O
wt would be the result :O

MI,gimme Stats of both against ENG then

Letz take in the other way
if warne would play as much as murali played against zimbave and all
wt would be the result

Warne Picked only 17 from 3 matches vs Them..never overtake Murali's 176 from 25 matches by this way

ill give u

Haseeh wrote:

Letz take in the other way
if warne would play as much as murali played against zimbave and all
wt would be the result

Warne Picked only 17 from 3 matches vs Them..never overtake Murali's 176 from 25 matches by this way

it would be like 172

In England
Murali 6 48 19.20
Warne 22 129 21.94
Still Murali stands above Warne..
Dont expect much change if you take records vs ENG

SK Warne 195 wickets averge 23.25
Murali 105 wicket avearge around 20-21

bt played a very few matches :O

176 only