New Zealand tour of England, 2013
+19
Fahad
bchattopadhyay
Farhan
Saad
Parth
sV
Mad max
Sanjay
Arjun
Haseeh
Venky
Vighnesh
Gursheen
Viresh
shreedhar hegde
Nishchal
Deep Dey
MI
Ashu
23 posters
Cricket World :: Archive :: CW MUSEUM
Page 16 of 28
Page 16 of 28 • 
1 ... 9 ... 15, 16, 17 ... 22 ... 28 
New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Wed 17 Apr 2013, 8:26 pm
First topic message reminder :
Discuss here about New Zealand Tour of England, 2013
Last edited by Deep Dey on Tue 02 Jul 2013, 8:17 pm; edited 8 times in total
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Viresh- Level 34
-
Posts : 41308
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Sun 19 May 2013, 7:08 pm
NO SPECIAL THREAD AS THERE IS 2 MATCHES ONLYSam wrote:@deep where thread pak vs scotland
POST HERE ONLY
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Sun 19 May 2013, 7:13 pm
Broad routes new zeland for 68
England 232 & 213
New Zealand 207 & 68 (22.3 ov)
England won by 170 runs
England 232 & 213
New Zealand 207 & 68 (22.3 ov)
England won by 170 runs
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Sun 19 May 2013, 7:36 pm
Pakistan vs Scotland - 2nd odi
Match cancelled due to rain
Match cancelled due to rain
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Haseeh Sun 19 May 2013, 7:39 pm
5 days to go ! Hope gonna put tight fight this time atleast2nd Test - England v New Zealand
Headingley, Leeds
Haseeh- Level 30
-
Posts : 32405
Ashu- Level 28
-
Posts : 27189
Fahad- Level 31
-
Posts : 34413
Haseeh- Level 30
-
Posts : 32405
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Fahad Tue 21 May 2013, 12:05 pm
That table is too cnfsing
so it starts from 24
so it starts from 24
Fahad- Level 31
-
Posts : 34413
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Tue 21 May 2013, 1:47 pm
some serious stats coming up
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Tue 21 May 2013, 1:48 pm
New Zealand's total of 68 in the fourth innings at Lord's is their ninth-lowest total in Tests; six of those have been against England. In terms of overs faced, the 22.3 that they were bowled out in at Lord's is their second-lowest ever, next only to the 19.2 that they faced against South Africa in Cape Town earlier this year.
This is also the fourth-lowest number of overs played by a team in a completed innings at Lord's, while there have been nine lower totals at the ground.
Forty wickets fell for 720 runs in the Test, an average of 18 runs per wicket. This is the lowest match average at Lord's in the last 12 years, and the second-lowest in the last 53. The only instance of a lower average since 1960 was the 2000 Test between England and West Indies, when 646 runs were scored for the loss of 38 wickets - an average of 17. England won that Test by two wickets despite being bowled out for 134 in their first innings, because they hit back and bowled West Indies out for 54 in their second. New Zealand's 68 is the lowest total at Lord's since West Indies' 54 in that game.
This is also the fourth-lowest number of overs played by a team in a completed innings at Lord's, while there have been nine lower totals at the ground.
Forty wickets fell for 720 runs in the Test, an average of 18 runs per wicket. This is the lowest match average at Lord's in the last 12 years, and the second-lowest in the last 53. The only instance of a lower average since 1960 was the 2000 Test between England and West Indies, when 646 runs were scored for the loss of 38 wickets - an average of 17. England won that Test by two wickets despite being bowled out for 134 in their first innings, because they hit back and bowled West Indies out for 54 in their second. New Zealand's 68 is the lowest total at Lord's since West Indies' 54 in that game.
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Tue 21 May 2013, 1:49 pm
For only the second time in their Test history, New Zealand's top six all fell for single-digit scores. The only previous instance of this happening was against Pakistan in Dhaka in 1955-56. Overall, this is the 19th such instance in Tests.
New Zealand lost their first six wickets for 29, the third time in 2013 that they've been six down for less than 40. In the first Test of the South Africa tour in Cape Town, they were six down for 28 before being bowled out for 45. In the next Test, in Port Elizabeth, they were 39 for 6 before being all out for 121.
Stuart Broad's figures of 7 for 44 are his best in Tests, and his second haul of seven in Tests: he had taken 7 for 72 against West Indies at the same venue last year. In ten Tests at Lord's, Broad has taken 47 wickets at 26.82; At no other venue has he taken even 20 Test wickets. (Click here for his venue-wise stats.)
Broad's seven wickets came in just 11 overs. Only four times in Test cricket has a bowler bowled fewer deliveries in an innings to finish with a haul of seven or more wickets. The last of those instances was in 1952, when Fred Trueman took 8 for 31 in 8.4 overs against India at Old Trafford.
New Zealand lost their first six wickets for 29, the third time in 2013 that they've been six down for less than 40. In the first Test of the South Africa tour in Cape Town, they were six down for 28 before being bowled out for 45. In the next Test, in Port Elizabeth, they were 39 for 6 before being all out for 121.
Stuart Broad's figures of 7 for 44 are his best in Tests, and his second haul of seven in Tests: he had taken 7 for 72 against West Indies at the same venue last year. In ten Tests at Lord's, Broad has taken 47 wickets at 26.82; At no other venue has he taken even 20 Test wickets. (Click here for his venue-wise stats.)
Broad's seven wickets came in just 11 overs. Only four times in Test cricket has a bowler bowled fewer deliveries in an innings to finish with a haul of seven or more wickets. The last of those instances was in 1952, when Fred Trueman took 8 for 31 in 8.4 overs against India at Old Trafford.
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Tue 21 May 2013, 1:50 pm
For the first time since 1999, a team was all out with two bowlers bowling unchanged through an entire innings. In 1999, Glenn McGrath and Jason Gillespie combined to bowl West Indies out for 51 in Port of Spain.
New Zealand's top-score in their second innings was 17, by Neil Wagner, batting at No. 9. Only five times in their Test history have New Zealand had a lower top-score. One of those five instances was in Cape Town earlier this year, when Kane Williamson's 13 was the top-score in a total of 45.
This is the fourth time in the last seven years that a No. 9 batsman has top-scored for New Zealand in Tests. Tim Southee did it in consecutive Tests in 2010-11 - scoring 31 against India in the third Test of the 2010 series in Nagpur, and 56 against Pakistan. Daniel Vettori was the other batsman who achieved it during this period, scoring 38 against South Africa in April 2006. Between March 1990 and March 2006, there wasn't a single such instance for New Zealand.
New Zealand didn't have a whole lot to celebrate on the final day, except in the first hour, when they took four wickets to bundle England out for 213. The architect of that collapse was Southee, who took six in the second innings to finish with a match haul of 10 for 108. Southee became only the second New Zealand bowler to take ten wickets in a Lord's Test. The first wasn't Richard Hadlee, but Dion Nash, who took 11 for 169 in 1994. Hadlee's best here was 8 for 135 in 1983, while he also took seven on a couple of occasions.
New Zealand's top-score in their second innings was 17, by Neil Wagner, batting at No. 9. Only five times in their Test history have New Zealand had a lower top-score. One of those five instances was in Cape Town earlier this year, when Kane Williamson's 13 was the top-score in a total of 45.
This is the fourth time in the last seven years that a No. 9 batsman has top-scored for New Zealand in Tests. Tim Southee did it in consecutive Tests in 2010-11 - scoring 31 against India in the third Test of the 2010 series in Nagpur, and 56 against Pakistan. Daniel Vettori was the other batsman who achieved it during this period, scoring 38 against South Africa in April 2006. Between March 1990 and March 2006, there wasn't a single such instance for New Zealand.
New Zealand didn't have a whole lot to celebrate on the final day, except in the first hour, when they took four wickets to bundle England out for 213. The architect of that collapse was Southee, who took six in the second innings to finish with a match haul of 10 for 108. Southee became only the second New Zealand bowler to take ten wickets in a Lord's Test. The first wasn't Richard Hadlee, but Dion Nash, who took 11 for 169 in 1994. Hadlee's best here was 8 for 135 in 1983, while he also took seven on a couple of occasions.
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Tue 21 May 2013, 2:03 pm
In Bell's ten Tests since sa series, he has averaged 33, and scored at just 31 per 100 balls - comfortably the slowest scoring rate of the 56 batsmen who have faced at least 500 balls in Tests since last July (with Compton and Root in second and third places), and with the 40th best average.
In his previous 20 Tests, dating back to the start of the 2010-11 Ashes, he had averaged 66, and scored at 59.5 per 100 balls - in that period, he was the 16th-fastest of the 80 batsmen who faced 500 or more balls (with the sixth-highest average).
Forty-three pairs of openers have opened in ten or more Test innings in the past ten years. Cook and Compton have the fifth-highest average partnership - 60.2 - but the fifth-lowest scoring rate, at 2.64 per over.
The Kiwis had been six down for under 40 only three times in their previous 300 Tests, over 47 years, dating back to when England had them 22 for 6 in Christchurch in 1966.
In his previous 20 Tests, dating back to the start of the 2010-11 Ashes, he had averaged 66, and scored at 59.5 per 100 balls - in that period, he was the 16th-fastest of the 80 batsmen who faced 500 or more balls (with the sixth-highest average).
Forty-three pairs of openers have opened in ten or more Test innings in the past ten years. Cook and Compton have the fifth-highest average partnership - 60.2 - but the fifth-lowest scoring rate, at 2.64 per over.
The Kiwis had been six down for under 40 only three times in their previous 300 Tests, over 47 years, dating back to when England had them 22 for 6 in Christchurch in 1966.
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Tue 21 May 2013, 2:08 pm
New Zealand's top six were all out in single figures in the second innings. This is only the 19th time this has happened in Tests, and the second for the Kiwis.
However, of the 19 teams whose top six have failed to trouble the second digit on the scoreboard, New Zealand's total of 29 runs is the joint highest. So, within the category of Teams Whose Top Six Have All Gone in Single Figures, they actually batted very well.
Tim Southee in his first 12 Tests away from home: 17 wickets, average 48.8. In his last four away Tests, since the Bangalore match last August: 30 wickets, average 13.5. Here endeth the stats.
Five of England's top six were out between 30 and 49 in the first innings - only the second time that has ever happened in a Test innings. In New Zealand's second innings at Edgbaston in 1965, five of their top six were out in the 40s.
However, of the 19 teams whose top six have failed to trouble the second digit on the scoreboard, New Zealand's total of 29 runs is the joint highest. So, within the category of Teams Whose Top Six Have All Gone in Single Figures, they actually batted very well.
Tim Southee in his first 12 Tests away from home: 17 wickets, average 48.8. In his last four away Tests, since the Bangalore match last August: 30 wickets, average 13.5. Here endeth the stats.
Five of England's top six were out between 30 and 49 in the first innings - only the second time that has ever happened in a Test innings. In New Zealand's second innings at Edgbaston in 1965, five of their top six were out in the 40s.
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Tue 21 May 2013, 2:09 pm
FHD wrote:That table is too cnfsing
so it starts from 24
kya problem hai???
will try to look into it
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Tue 21 May 2013, 2:16 pm
Bruce Martin will miss rest of series due to calf injury in 1st test.
Vettori added in test squad
Vettori added in test squad
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Nishchal Tue 21 May 2013, 2:52 pm
i want to see vettori playin 
Nishchal- Level 28
-
Posts : 26828
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Wed 22 May 2013, 11:31 pm
McCullum will do keeping work in 2nd test
no watling
no watling
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Fri 24 May 2013, 1:37 pm
VETTORI NOT TO PLAY 2ND TEST
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Farhan- Level 17
-
Posts : 6329
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Fri 24 May 2013, 9:31 pm
day 1 of 2nd test washed out
stumps - day 1
stumps - day 1
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Viresh- Level 34
-
Posts : 41308
Re: New Zealand tour of England, 2013
by Deep Dey Sat 25 May 2013, 7:49 pm
England 132/3 (48.5 ov)
New Zealand
England won the toss and elected to bat
root 35
bell 25
New Zealand
England won the toss and elected to bat
root 35
bell 25
Deep Dey- Level 47
-
Posts : 69721
Page 16 of 28 • 1 ... 9 ... 15, 16, 17 ... 22 ... 28
Similar topics» New Zealand tour of Bangladesh, 2013/14
» Thread for England Tour of India, 2012/13 (2)
» Thread for Australia Tour of UK(Ireland and England)
» Thread for England Tour of New Zeland, 2012/13
» Thread for England Tour of India, 2012/13 (3)
» Thread for England Tour of India, 2012/13 (2)
» Thread for Australia Tour of UK(Ireland and England)
» Thread for England Tour of New Zeland, 2012/13
» Thread for England Tour of India, 2012/13 (3)
Cricket World :: Archive :: CW MUSEUM
Page 16 of 28
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
